Sean White: Posted on Friday, May 27, 2016 2:46 PM
Q:
Sean: Thanks for a great course. Two questions: I think I would like some additional training for the PV Installation Professional Certification Exam. Do you have any recommendations? Also with the addition practice questions, I got really knotted up on questions 74 and 78. On question 78, when you state the temperature coefficient for the module, is this actually Voc x Temperature Coefficient Voc? Again, thank you for two great classes. I look forward to meeting you in person someday, and perhaps attending hands-on training you might offer. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:52 AM
Submitted: 05/21/2016 Training: 40-Hour Advanced Solar PV Installer Training / Online / Anytime
How would you rate this course? 10/10 What did you like about the course?: That it continuosly answers questions that I've had or I get in the workplace. I like that Sean uses a lot of examples and does not limit to the short explanation of an answer. How effective was the instructor's communication during the course?: Great. What would you change about the course? |
|
Sean White: Posted on Wednesday, May 25, 2016 6:35 AM
From HeatSpring Advanced PV Course Discussion Board
Q:
I took the April exam for the first time and just found out I PASSED. After the completion of this course I felt really prepared and confident going into it . This course definitely covered enough information to pass the NABCEP exam and much more that I will be able to apply in my future career in solar. Sean White's book is the "Swiss army knife "of study material. Somewhat small but jammed packed with all sorts of useful information. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Tuesday, May 17, 2016 10:09 AM
Q:
Article 690 - Part II - 690.7(C): Maximum System Voltage. In your lecture you mentioned that the NEC distinguishes between 3 family dwellings (up to 1000V PV max system voltage), versus 1-2 family dwellings (up to 6000V PV max system voltage). Two questions: First, I proudly bought the book, but I do not see this distinction in 690.7. From what I read, it addresses 600V and 1000V. Second, it seems arbitrary to distinguish to maximum inverter size between 3 family dwellings vs. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Friday, April 29, 2016 12:59 AM
Q:
Dear Doc, A little late question ,concerning article 310 and 110.14 (c),110.14(c)(1)(a) or (C)(1)(b) When you talk about terminal ratings,I am aware of three areas in solar where wires terminate ,combiner box ,inverter and main panel ocpd. Are we talking here about, adjustment and correction factors ,dealing with ocpd of the solar breaker in main panel or the equipment shutoff breaker ,I am assuming these articles are referring to the main panel termination or equipment shut off termination. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Thursday, April 14, 2016 11:42 AM
Q:
Hi Sean, The new regulation for the 'rapid shutdown' function, was driven by first responders for their safety, do you think that they may request that the rapid shutdown be installed on existing large commercial systems? Thanks
A:
Once something is built, inspected and permitted, the AHJ does not come back and make them change it. I am sure that they could request it.
Insurance companies and owners would probably be the driving force for something like this, seeing how they would like the firefighters to put out the fire, rather than watching it burn out of fear of shock. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:22 AM
Q:
Uh, did I miss something? I thought this course was until the end of this month. Or is this overlapping cycles? I was planning to take this class as part of the 58 hours I need to even qualify to take the NABCEP test this fall. I plan to return here to bone up after applying the lessons learned here on two more systems I'm planning to build to qualify also as the systems I built before my knee (and other body parts) crashed out in '12 don't qualify any more. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:04 AM
Q:
You said, "if the entire string is shaded with MPPT, then the PV source circuit would operate as if the entire string was in the shade.." ... But then what of the other strings still in the sun? Assuming for this example that there is some flat horizontal object (like a neighboring building) that causes the bottom landscape series string to experience a lower light level (not zero). So therefore the amperage of that bottom string would be less than the other (parrallel) horizontally strung series strings above the lowest shaded string. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, April 9, 2016 5:18 AM
Message for those of you here preparing to take the NABCEP PV Installation Professional Certification Exam, which is in 8-days!
Now is time to study hard. No procrastinating. Learn the material, but do not get overwhelmed with a concept that is difficult to understand. Remember that the exam is a numbers game. There are many very difficult questions and nobody gets all of the questions correct. Budget your study time wisely and plan to not study hard the night before. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Monday, April 4, 2016 9:53 AM
Q:
Hi Sean, NABCEP includes the following practice question in the NABCEP PV Installation Professionals Resource Guide: - The battery bank for a backup utility-interactive PV System is located in a harsh environment with temp and humidity extremes. The system does not have a provision for temp compensation. What is the MOST LIKELY result on the battery state of charge?
c.) Overcharged in cold weather and undercharged in hot weather. d.) Undercharged in cold weather and overcharged in hot weather. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, April 2, 2016 12:17 PM
Q:
Sean, Why are all three bypass diodes affected by shading on the short edge of the module? What about the wiring/arrangement of the diodes causes them to be affected this way? Also, what does MPPT stand for? Thank you,
A:
MPPT stands for Maximum Power Point Tracking. As we showed on the IV curve, there is a "sweet spot" where PV will work best with the optimal voltage and current combination for a given temperature and irradiance. With temperature and irradiance constantly changing, the MPPT will shift to optimize the PV production. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:32 AM
Q:
Hi Sean, The layout of an array, landscape vs portrait was to install as many modules as possible in the available space, maximizing the size of the system. From your discussion regarding the bypass diode, I note that if there were any shading issues, orientation of the module, when positioned in landscape will have the least affect on the functionality of the bypass diode and thus module output. Thanks
A:
That is correct for typical crystalline PV assuming the normal shadow pattern with the shadow coming from the lower part of the module as with inter-row shading as opposed to a shadow coming from the side. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:36 AM
Q:
Hi Sean, Big picture here, in efforts to help deploy more solar in the residential market, do you foresee a national permit standard ever being adopted? I know of a few states who have moved to a statewide standard, bringing down cost of permit and turnaround times. Also appreciate your breaking NEC into digestible sections (less intimidating). Thanks again
A:
I think that it is part of our political culture. 50 states, 50 state governments and then many many more municipalities. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:27 AM
Q:
Hi Doc, here in Indiana land we mostly use schedule 40 conduit and armored cable and flexi steel conduit I have not had the opportunity to couple EMT,and my question is on 300 7 (B) expansion fittings,are these special couplings ,can you explain more of this,or a picture paints a thousand words ,and you could add some words to explain more . Thanks much really enjoying this stuff.
A:
Here is a report that is about a famous PV fire on a rooftop in Bakersfield. Nobody was hurt and the building didn't burn down, but the fire led to a big push towards ungrounded PV systems, which would not have caught on fire in this case. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, March 12, 2016 12:33 PM
Submitted: 03/11/2016 Training: 40-Hour Advanced Solar PV Installer Training / Online / Anytime
How would you rate this course? 10/10 What did you like about the course?: Learning the code and how it should be applied/interpreted through real life solar examples provided by Sean. How effective was the instructor's communication during the course?: Impeccable. What would you change about the course?: I can't think of anything.
|
|
Sean White: Posted on Friday, March 11, 2016 12:26 PM
Q:
Hey Sean, This might not be specific to wire sizing (kind of is) but do you have a good way to crimp MC4 connectors? I am doing an array on my house and don't want to buy a crimping tool. They have pre-made MC4 wires and I was thinking about skipping the hassle and buying the pre-fabricated ones.
A:
That is a common thing that people try to do. I remember a job where someone tried it and the system wouldn't turn on. They had to spend a day taking apart things and figuring out under which module the bad connection was. |
|
Posted on Friday, March 11, 2016 11:18 AM
Q:
Hey Sean, With the 10 foot tap rule, do you know where that came from? Do you see a lot of inspectors looking for this? It does not seem like a very solid rule, one of those that is more a of guideline.
A:
The 10-foot Tap Rule, 240.21(B)(1) is as solid as a flimsy 2014 NEC Code Book.
We have had the tap rules for plain old feeder taps for as long as I have been getting electrocuted (death by shock). I do not see the Tap Rules in the 1897 NEC here: https://www. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Wednesday, March 9, 2016 2:29 PM
Q:
Hi Doc, assignment 23/36 you explain bonding of neutral to a sub panel, question: is a subpanel specifically manufactured as thus ,or is it as its name applies,my thoughts are they are manufactured as thus,because of the raised neutral buss ,am I correct in assuming the latter? thanks
A:
You can typically physically bond neutral to ground in many different places, including disconnects, panelboards (main panels and sub panels) and just about anywhere if you are determined. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Tuesday, March 8, 2016 10:23 AM
Training: 40-Hour Advanced Solar PV Installer Training / Online / Anytime
How would you rate this course? 10/10 What did you like about the course?: Some of this stuff is very complicated, but Sean made it as clear as possible. How effective was the instructor's communication during the course?: Very clear. What would you change about the course?: N/A If you enjoyed the course and are interested in providing a testimonial, please enter one here. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, March 5, 2016 11:08 PM
From HeatSpring Advanced PV Course Discussion Board
Q:
hi Doc ,really enjoying
your humor and the way your talking points come through. Two questions though:this pertains to assignment 16/36, 1)roof slope angle short cut,the inverse tan function is not on my calculator
is there another long method of completing that function and 2)the 120% rule the 50 amps *0.8 where did the 0.8 come from ? appreciate all the help,ok forgive me one more thing,in the string sizing
calculation when I click on the [1/x] function it displays |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:32 PM
From HeatSpring Advanced PV Online Course Discussion Board
Q:
For the 705.12(D)(2)(1)(b) solution where the
AHJ insists that the OCPD be placed at the current source, what does the OCPD
setup look like? A small load center with a PV Breaker and a couple Ilsco taps?
A:
Hi Robert,
There are a number of ways this can look and since this is
relatively new, there is not a standard.
Overview: 705.12(D)(2)(1)(b) gives us a way of
connecting to a feeder and protecting the feeder with an overcurrent protection
device. |
|
Sean White: Posted on Saturday, March 5, 2016 9:59 PM
Q:
Sean, I think 690.8 is a little confusing because I
usually think of the "Conditions of use" derates applying to the
conductor ampacity, and the Maximum Circuit Current applies to source circuit
output. For garden-variety strings, am I understanding the application of
690.8(B)(1) and 690.8(B)(2) correctly? For 690.8(B)(1), Minimum Conductor Ampacity = [Module Isc] * 156% (Roof temperatures 50C or less AND 3 or less Conductors)
For 690. |
|